![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Doctor Who "Lucky Day" Review (Spoilers)
May. 3rd, 2025 03:06 pmAlso reviews for the latest episodes of Law & Order: Organized Crime, and Law & Order: Special Victims Unit.
( Read more... )
( Read more... )
RIP Ruth Buzzi
May. 3rd, 2025 06:23 amMost known for Laugh-In but I always loved her as Ruthie on Sesame Street.
I can't think of a single one. The reporting is beyond shoddy (with a ton of errors), controversies often seem to be slanted in favor of toxic YouTube Neckbeards (which makes sense because they ARE probably the primary readership.) They post bland meaningless lists with absolutely no thought or effort put into ANY of the choices on said list.
They recently did a list of 20 sitcoms from the 1990's ALMOST as a good as Seinfeld. What made number 2?
Saved By The Bell.
I honestly cannot think of a single positive thing or good insight that website has ever given the world. We are stupider and worse off for it existing.
What's fucked up, is even on the rare occasions they mean well, they can't help but getting everything wrong. They recently did a post about movies that were damaging to the mentally ill and contributed towards negative stigma against us.
On the list was... American Psycho. For portraying poor put-upon narcissists and sociopaths as more violent than most actually are.
How stupid is this site? I feel dumber for reading that opinion. My liberal guilt does not extend to psychopaths and narcissists. If it did, Vic Puff and Donna Demented would have entirely different arcs than they do.
They recently did a list of 20 sitcoms from the 1990's ALMOST as a good as Seinfeld. What made number 2?
Saved By The Bell.
I honestly cannot think of a single positive thing or good insight that website has ever given the world. We are stupider and worse off for it existing.
What's fucked up, is even on the rare occasions they mean well, they can't help but getting everything wrong. They recently did a post about movies that were damaging to the mentally ill and contributed towards negative stigma against us.
On the list was... American Psycho. For portraying poor put-upon narcissists and sociopaths as more violent than most actually are.
How stupid is this site? I feel dumber for reading that opinion. My liberal guilt does not extend to psychopaths and narcissists. If it did, Vic Puff and Donna Demented would have entirely different arcs than they do.
Over the past few days I have been going back and forth through all 19 issues of it and correcting, fixing, fudging, and making consistent everything that didn't fit together perfectly earlier. Because I can re-edit that entire portion of the saga at will instead of being boxed in with several issues in the can, streamlining and fixing plotholes and continuity snarls is a breeze.
That's the actual reason I did it, you know. But in my mind that was a "Just in case the worst happens and I need to start over" scenario. I never envisioned it being so immediately useful over and over again, even with me pleased with the way things turned out.
No mistakes in The Un-Iverse. Just opportunities and missed opportunities.
That's the actual reason I did it, you know. But in my mind that was a "Just in case the worst happens and I need to start over" scenario. I never envisioned it being so immediately useful over and over again, even with me pleased with the way things turned out.
No mistakes in The Un-Iverse. Just opportunities and missed opportunities.
Talkback for Gilda And Meek And The Un-Iverse! Read an issue and discuss it here!
TWO Articles below!
THE MULTIVERSE IS OVERPLAYED IN POPULAR CULTURE. WHY DRAG GILDA AND MEEK INTO IT?
First of all, the significance of the Multiverse in The Un-Iverse was decided on LONG before the MCU and DCEU ran it into the ground. It is in fact one of THE most central themes of everything.
Regardless of the fact of the concept turning into a total assfire everywhere else, should I rethink THE central theme of The Un-Iverse just because the notion has gotten unpopular and poorly regarded?
Other creators might do that, but I don't dictate the story based on what is popular.
But still, the idea could weaken and overly complicate things in a franchise where it is TOTALLY unnecessary (to the layman, at least). There is a single continuity for The Un-Iverse, and it's not like we can have awesome explosive crossovers based on different beloved iterations of the characters. Only one actually exists. So why do it?
Well, aside from being able to map differences between a Lucky Universe, and ones that AREN'T inherently lucky, I suppose the thing that makes it the right decision for the story is I use the idea for an entirely different reason than comic books and science fiction. Yeah, we'll get around to seeing bizarre Universes where Gilda and Meek are evil, or even grosser, MARRIED to each other, but that's window dressing. Fun to explore the premise, but not the reason the premise exists.
The premise exists to tie OUR Universe to The Un-Iverse.
The Multiverse in Gilda And Meek is a LOT bigger in scope than Marvel or DC's, which tend to believe each Universe is changed by various different decisions. Regardless of Earths in DC during the first Crisis being supposedly Infinite, they actually aren't if that's the only thing that changes from Universe to Universe. For The Un-Iverse, the Infinite is FAR broader in scope.
As the mysterious Beautiful Woman explains to Gilda in the short prose story "A Foot In The Door":
"Gilda, my child, you think too small. You assume decisions are binary, or that they are all in your control. A Universe isn't merely created whether or not you decide to brush your teeth. If you brush your teeth a Universe is created where you brushed for 30 seconds, one where you did for 17 seconds, and another a full minute. Some Universes you brushed hard, some you brushed fast. But every brush stroke you took created an infinite number of Universes from that, some of whose differences boil down to your toothbrush having two fewer atomic units of toothpaste from the other, or brushing a millionth of a millimeter to the left. Infinite Universes are created not just from your decisions, not just everyone else's decisions, but every being in the entire galaxy and galaxies of galaxies' decisions. An amoeba splits, a Universe is made, as are infinite versions where it went down slightly differently. You want proof for the existence of God? Just the fact that it is possible that there is a Universe out there created by an intelligent design means it happened somewhere. And if there is a God looking out for one Universe, there is probably a Mega God out there taking it upon Himself to look out for ALL Universes, even the ones He Himself didn't create. The fact that God COULD exist, means He does. And yes, somewhere out there the Flying Spaghetti Monster is very, very real. Fear him. He is still more plausible than Scientology."
--The Beautiful Woman, A Foot In The Door.
New Universes aren't just created by split binary decisions. Universes explode in infinite directions based on toothpaste molecules. Maybe because other Multiverse stuff has a lot of big crossover shit to excite their readers with, they can't really get down into the mindblowing nitty-gritty like I do here.
The way the non-binary rules of The Un-Iverse work means that if it's POSSIBLE to have happened ANYWHERE, it DID happen somewhere. The Beautiful Woman nonchalantly just proved the fact that God exists in this story, and I want the reader to question if that logic would actually work for OUR Universe too. That's an open question.
What isn't is the fact that the non-binaryness of the Infinite in the story suggests that if ANYTHING could happen, and if that goes for OUR Universe too, that means The Un-Iverse is actually real far out there in a Multiverse we cannot fathom. As is potentially every fictional story. Or even every widely debated belief system. The Un-Iverse's Multiverse doesn't simply make a bunch of different interpretations of Gilda And Meek canon with each other. It makes the story canon with every single thing in our Universe that ever was or ever will be.
Also it suggests when the Multiverse is at risk in a Gilda And Meek story, WE are at risk too, and have a personal stake in the story. If Gilda And Meek don't save the day, the Reader could potentially die or cease to exist. Ever see Marvel and DC do that? No? That's why it's still a thing in The Un-Iverse. Because nobody is thinking through how cool the hard sci-fi is and are more interested in cashing out huge paychecks to legacy actors who viewers haven't seen in their famous roles in years. Not a shabby use of the premise of all, but I'd argue since that appears to be the ONLY use of the premise so far (outside of the excellent Everything Everywhere All At Once) it's still not using the premise to its fullest.
I look at the infinite Marvel and DC have tapped into, and they seem more interested in appealing to long-time fans with famous crossovers instead of exploring the hard sci-fi, and yes, FANTASY elements baked into the premise. So even IF The Multiverse is played out elsewhere, my take is still singularly unique (at least so far). I still have the entire field of this wild idea to myself (for the time being). I might not always.
STATUS UPDATE FOR GILDA AND MEEK "ENTER TORK" SPECIAL EDITION
I said last week if the Special Edition to "Enter Tork" didn't hit the site this week something will have gone very wrong.
I was wrong. Something went very RIGHT instead. I absolutely LOVE the artwork. I am only unsatisfied with TWO pictures out of the 28 pages I've drawn so far (and one is weirdly the cover). I am SO excited I HAVE managed to step up my artistic game RIGHT before The Dark Child Saga: The Fall Of F.I.S.H. and The Terran Wars, but it is a total relief to me I did.
I'm gonna take my time to get the rest of the artwork right (perfection IS something I am going to strive for in The Terran Wars, and it would be good to attempt it earlier in a less taxing issue) including redoing the cover and fixing the one panel I don't like.
Gimme another week or two, all right? I promise it will be worth it.
TWO Articles below!
THE MULTIVERSE IS OVERPLAYED IN POPULAR CULTURE. WHY DRAG GILDA AND MEEK INTO IT?
First of all, the significance of the Multiverse in The Un-Iverse was decided on LONG before the MCU and DCEU ran it into the ground. It is in fact one of THE most central themes of everything.
Regardless of the fact of the concept turning into a total assfire everywhere else, should I rethink THE central theme of The Un-Iverse just because the notion has gotten unpopular and poorly regarded?
Other creators might do that, but I don't dictate the story based on what is popular.
But still, the idea could weaken and overly complicate things in a franchise where it is TOTALLY unnecessary (to the layman, at least). There is a single continuity for The Un-Iverse, and it's not like we can have awesome explosive crossovers based on different beloved iterations of the characters. Only one actually exists. So why do it?
Well, aside from being able to map differences between a Lucky Universe, and ones that AREN'T inherently lucky, I suppose the thing that makes it the right decision for the story is I use the idea for an entirely different reason than comic books and science fiction. Yeah, we'll get around to seeing bizarre Universes where Gilda and Meek are evil, or even grosser, MARRIED to each other, but that's window dressing. Fun to explore the premise, but not the reason the premise exists.
The premise exists to tie OUR Universe to The Un-Iverse.
The Multiverse in Gilda And Meek is a LOT bigger in scope than Marvel or DC's, which tend to believe each Universe is changed by various different decisions. Regardless of Earths in DC during the first Crisis being supposedly Infinite, they actually aren't if that's the only thing that changes from Universe to Universe. For The Un-Iverse, the Infinite is FAR broader in scope.
As the mysterious Beautiful Woman explains to Gilda in the short prose story "A Foot In The Door":
"Gilda, my child, you think too small. You assume decisions are binary, or that they are all in your control. A Universe isn't merely created whether or not you decide to brush your teeth. If you brush your teeth a Universe is created where you brushed for 30 seconds, one where you did for 17 seconds, and another a full minute. Some Universes you brushed hard, some you brushed fast. But every brush stroke you took created an infinite number of Universes from that, some of whose differences boil down to your toothbrush having two fewer atomic units of toothpaste from the other, or brushing a millionth of a millimeter to the left. Infinite Universes are created not just from your decisions, not just everyone else's decisions, but every being in the entire galaxy and galaxies of galaxies' decisions. An amoeba splits, a Universe is made, as are infinite versions where it went down slightly differently. You want proof for the existence of God? Just the fact that it is possible that there is a Universe out there created by an intelligent design means it happened somewhere. And if there is a God looking out for one Universe, there is probably a Mega God out there taking it upon Himself to look out for ALL Universes, even the ones He Himself didn't create. The fact that God COULD exist, means He does. And yes, somewhere out there the Flying Spaghetti Monster is very, very real. Fear him. He is still more plausible than Scientology."
--The Beautiful Woman, A Foot In The Door.
New Universes aren't just created by split binary decisions. Universes explode in infinite directions based on toothpaste molecules. Maybe because other Multiverse stuff has a lot of big crossover shit to excite their readers with, they can't really get down into the mindblowing nitty-gritty like I do here.
The way the non-binary rules of The Un-Iverse work means that if it's POSSIBLE to have happened ANYWHERE, it DID happen somewhere. The Beautiful Woman nonchalantly just proved the fact that God exists in this story, and I want the reader to question if that logic would actually work for OUR Universe too. That's an open question.
What isn't is the fact that the non-binaryness of the Infinite in the story suggests that if ANYTHING could happen, and if that goes for OUR Universe too, that means The Un-Iverse is actually real far out there in a Multiverse we cannot fathom. As is potentially every fictional story. Or even every widely debated belief system. The Un-Iverse's Multiverse doesn't simply make a bunch of different interpretations of Gilda And Meek canon with each other. It makes the story canon with every single thing in our Universe that ever was or ever will be.
Also it suggests when the Multiverse is at risk in a Gilda And Meek story, WE are at risk too, and have a personal stake in the story. If Gilda And Meek don't save the day, the Reader could potentially die or cease to exist. Ever see Marvel and DC do that? No? That's why it's still a thing in The Un-Iverse. Because nobody is thinking through how cool the hard sci-fi is and are more interested in cashing out huge paychecks to legacy actors who viewers haven't seen in their famous roles in years. Not a shabby use of the premise of all, but I'd argue since that appears to be the ONLY use of the premise so far (outside of the excellent Everything Everywhere All At Once) it's still not using the premise to its fullest.
I look at the infinite Marvel and DC have tapped into, and they seem more interested in appealing to long-time fans with famous crossovers instead of exploring the hard sci-fi, and yes, FANTASY elements baked into the premise. So even IF The Multiverse is played out elsewhere, my take is still singularly unique (at least so far). I still have the entire field of this wild idea to myself (for the time being). I might not always.
STATUS UPDATE FOR GILDA AND MEEK "ENTER TORK" SPECIAL EDITION
I said last week if the Special Edition to "Enter Tork" didn't hit the site this week something will have gone very wrong.
I was wrong. Something went very RIGHT instead. I absolutely LOVE the artwork. I am only unsatisfied with TWO pictures out of the 28 pages I've drawn so far (and one is weirdly the cover). I am SO excited I HAVE managed to step up my artistic game RIGHT before The Dark Child Saga: The Fall Of F.I.S.H. and The Terran Wars, but it is a total relief to me I did.
I'm gonna take my time to get the rest of the artwork right (perfection IS something I am going to strive for in The Terran Wars, and it would be good to attempt it earlier in a less taxing issue) including redoing the cover and fixing the one panel I don't like.
Gimme another week or two, all right? I promise it will be worth it.
I only saw the first episode back when it was airing and thought it was pedestrian and unfunny. But really people SAVAGED that show. For supposedly being obvious and unfunny, and basically being as assholish as possible to Republicans in ways even THEY don't deserve.
20 years later, for THAT specific complaint, I'm thinking liberals ought to have stuck up for it more than we did. Granted, the show wasn't great, but I don't think the show was canceled after one season because of bad ratings. It was because of the backlash.
The backlash was obviously bullshit then and now. Now it's bullshit because I am supposed to believe the American people, who have elected Donald Trump twice now, have political tastes much too sophisticated for that show's boorishness. Yeah, no. Bullshit.
The thing that was bullshit at the time was the idea that the gross attacks against Republicans were unfair. They weren't, but even if they were, I remember the types of shots South Park was taking at liberals at the time. Stan once became a vegetarian and his lack of eating meat caused sores to develop all over his body. It turns out they were vaginas because he was turning into a giant pussy. Explain to me how the politics of THAT are smarter and savvier than Lil' Dick Cheney biting the head off a chicken.
20 years later, for THAT specific complaint, I'm thinking liberals ought to have stuck up for it more than we did. Granted, the show wasn't great, but I don't think the show was canceled after one season because of bad ratings. It was because of the backlash.
The backlash was obviously bullshit then and now. Now it's bullshit because I am supposed to believe the American people, who have elected Donald Trump twice now, have political tastes much too sophisticated for that show's boorishness. Yeah, no. Bullshit.
The thing that was bullshit at the time was the idea that the gross attacks against Republicans were unfair. They weren't, but even if they were, I remember the types of shots South Park was taking at liberals at the time. Stan once became a vegetarian and his lack of eating meat caused sores to develop all over his body. It turns out they were vaginas because he was turning into a giant pussy. Explain to me how the politics of THAT are smarter and savvier than Lil' Dick Cheney biting the head off a chicken.
Also reviews for the latest episodes of Law & Order, Law & Order: Special Victims, and the two episode premiere of Law & Order: Organized Crime.
( Read more... )
( Read more... )
"The Velveteen Rabbit" Review (Spoilers)
Apr. 16th, 2025 08:58 pmThe Velveteen Rabbit by Margery Williams
I finally read this. This book is pure. This books understands real in a way nothing else I have ever read does. It is by turns tragic, magical, and beautiful.
The book was written in 1922. As a rule, I don't like books this old. I don't connect with them. Williams found something in 1922 that was Universal and timeless, and the messaging still works in a world entirely absent scarlet fever. The book moved me and it matters. *****.
I finally read this. This book is pure. This books understands real in a way nothing else I have ever read does. It is by turns tragic, magical, and beautiful.
The book was written in 1922. As a rule, I don't like books this old. I don't connect with them. Williams found something in 1922 that was Universal and timeless, and the messaging still works in a world entirely absent scarlet fever. The book moved me and it matters. *****.
He's kind, and stupid people are not kind. It's not something they are born with or something they can learn. Whatever Jeff is, the fact that he sees the world positively and makes the Smith family better in ways they don't even realize at the time says he's not truly stupid.
