Jan. 7th, 2010

matt_zimmer: (Default)
Just saw both parts. A full review will come later but I just wanted to ask the biggest question on my mind right now: I've seen on lj and elsewhere that this two-parter was VERY controversial amongst certain sections of the Doctor Who fandom. May I ask why? It wasn't phenomenal or anything but I hardly saw it as controversial as say, Torchwood: Children of Earth (which I loved but could see very easily how some could hate it). Did it screw with the old show canon in a way I'm not aware of? I was only a casual Whobie back in the day so I don't really remember if the Time Lords were portrayed any different. Were they? Is that why people were upset? Did people think Tennant deserved a better ending? (I agree, it WAS unsatisfying but it was about as satisfying as the concept of regeneration allows). What was the big deal that is tearing apart the fandom?

August 2025

S M T W T F S
      12
34 567 89
10 11 1213141516
17 18192021 2223
2425 26 272829 30
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 2nd, 2025 12:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios