Jan. 7th, 2010

matt_zimmer: (Default)
Just saw both parts. A full review will come later but I just wanted to ask the biggest question on my mind right now: I've seen on lj and elsewhere that this two-parter was VERY controversial amongst certain sections of the Doctor Who fandom. May I ask why? It wasn't phenomenal or anything but I hardly saw it as controversial as say, Torchwood: Children of Earth (which I loved but could see very easily how some could hate it). Did it screw with the old show canon in a way I'm not aware of? I was only a casual Whobie back in the day so I don't really remember if the Time Lords were portrayed any different. Were they? Is that why people were upset? Did people think Tennant deserved a better ending? (I agree, it WAS unsatisfying but it was about as satisfying as the concept of regeneration allows). What was the big deal that is tearing apart the fandom?

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 34
5 678 91011
12131415 161718
19 202122 23 2425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 27th, 2025 06:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios